But I was hired by a patron to review it, specifically to see (1) if my life experience jibed with what the book says (especially as a feminist and polyamorous man with a substantial relationship history to call upon), but, more importantly, (2) how it fares in light of what I deem essential principles of epistemology and critical thinking. I am always extremely skeptical of sources like this (for reasons I’ll illustrate shortly). Glover also published a book of dating advice for men (which I have not read), and pretty much runs his life as a high-priced self-help guru for men. I am here reviewing just the one book, which proposes a particular psychology of men, or at least of a particular kind of man (although it hedges on whether there even are any other kind of men but Nice Guys and ex-Nice-Guys). It has companion guides and workbooks that go along with it, but I did not consult them. Nice Guy (in reference to the sarcastic “Nice Guy” trope), is not a peer-reviewed academic work but a pop-market advice-manual. Glover, a real psychotherapist-presumably his bio attests a PhD in family and marriage therapy and years of clinical practice, although I found no appreciable research publication history (a point that will become relevant). Today I will be reviewing a book by, about, and for men.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |